History of Saint Expedite

The History of Saint Expedite

Origins and Early Accounts

The precise historical origins of Saint Expedite are shrouded in some mystery, and he is not listed in the earliest Christian martyrologies. His veneration appears to have gained prominence much later, possibly around the 17th or 18th century in parts of Europe, particularly Germany and Sicily. Several legends attempt to explain his emergence.

One popular story involves a crate marked "Spedito" (meaning dispatched or sent quickly in Italian) arriving at a convent containing relics of an unknown martyr. The nuns, unsure of the saint's identity but understanding the marking, began praying to "Santo Spedito" for urgent needs, establishing his association with speed. (Williams, K. L., Louisiana Folklife)

Another account identifies him as a Roman centurion, possibly named Elpidius or Expeditus, martyred in Melitene, Armenia, around 303 AD during the Diocletianic Persecution. Legend states that as he resolved to convert to Christianity, the devil appeared as a crow (or snake) crying "Cras!" (Tomorrow!), urging delay. Expeditus stamped on the crow, declaring "Hodie!" (Today!), signifying his decisive action against procrastination. (Williams, K. L., Louisiana Folklife; Various folk traditions)

Spread of Veneration

Devotion to Saint Expedite spread, particularly through France and its colonies, eventually reaching Réunion Island, Latin America, and notably, New Orleans in the United States. His reputation as a patron of urgent causes, swift solutions, and against procrastination resonated across different cultures. (Williams, K. L., Louisiana Folklife)

The publication of prayers and novenas dedicated to him further solidified his place in folk Catholicism, often outside formal liturgical calendars but deeply embedded in personal and communal spiritual practice.

Recognition and Controversy

Saint Expedite has never been formally canonized by the Catholic Church in the modern sense, and his name was removed from some regional martyrologies in the early 20th century due to the lack of clear historical evidence. However, this lack of official inclusion has not diminished his popularity among devotees.

He remains a figure primarily venerated through popular piety and folk traditions rather than official liturgical recognition, highlighting the distinction between formal Church doctrine and the lived spiritual experiences of its members.

References